Innit patently illustrative/suggestive that you swallow this particular myth wholesale—while valiantly rejecting others similarly entrenched? Curious minds would be well-advised to investigate the reasons behind 😉
The Einstein relativity dogma is a classic example, it is has been disproved so many times & is in itself not based on any verifiable evidence, yet its accepted as fact. Einstein spent not one day in a lab in his life, or conducting experiments elsewhere. When it was discovered that galaxies have a uniform rotation rate - that should have destroyed Einstein's relativity - instead, they invented dark matter & dark energy. The evidence for this? None. None is needed. They jus invented it to maintain the Einstein myth.
>People get really mad when I deny that black holes exist or make the claim that the earth is hollow and expanding, or assert that virology is a pseudoscience and deny the existence of Charlemagne and the so-called ‘dark ages’,. Lol.
That is one reason I like to read your posts, I have pretty similar views.
As for Charlemagne, there is a German author Heribert Illig who wrote a book about "phantom time" .
Not sure I agree with all the conclusions, but it has some interesting tidbits.
"According to this scenario, the entire Carolingian period, including the figure of Charlemagne, is a fabrication, with a "phantom time" of 297 years (AD 614–911) added to the Early Middle Ages. "
Needless to say, the EUSSR Bolsheviks in Brussels hate it, they have a Charlemagne price, and it also puts into question the myth of Karlsruhe, "where Charlemagne rests" by name, which has a pyramid city layout that Washington DC copied.
As for black holes, or what they call them, I could show you one with any magnet and a field viewer.
A field viewer is two simple glass plates with ferro fluid in between them put together with duck tape and a bunch of LEDs to illuminate the "screen". You put a magnet under the viewer, and will see at the center of the Torriod a "black hole", you can also see blue and red shift. Fine Holography easily built yourself. A drop of blood would do instead of buying a ferro fluid.
As for these mentioned German documents and texts, I think it is about time soon, to make them accessible for non German speakers. However, I know a lot of people who utterly fear that, it truly scares them.
I love every time that I hear someone "believes" in Science. Well we did kind of get Huxley's Scientific Dictatorship after all. Global Warming/Climate Change is my favorite. Killing the earth to save it with "renewables." Science is a tool. I don't believe in my hammer any more than I believe in Science. If your science doesn't fit reality then it is wrong, figure out a different means; this was supposed to be the Scientific Method but that got jettisoned as soon as it was convenient. Modern Physics revolves around mathematics now, a complete inversion of the relationship.
Dark Matter and Energy are other fun absurdities, they're a fudge factor to make a model work. Humanity being the product of transgenic evolution despite evidence of human habitation going back millions of years. Electric Universe is a fun way to get people riled up.
This is a fun post and very entertaining, thank you.
One piece of feedback: you should differentiate the two definitions of science. While the media pushed “Trust the Science!” slogans throughout the “pandemic”, which pro-government supporters eagerly adopted and pushed on their unfortunate friends and family as a virtue signal, what these people really trusted was Scientism: science as politicized approval by committee, i.e. trust the “scientific consensus” which relied on incomplete and inaccurate data modeling combined with massive pressure to conform to group decisions. This was an intentional bastardization of the traditional understanding of the definition of science as "a series of rigorous, repeatable experiments under rigid criteria." If you can’t repeat an experiment, it isn’t science — it’s scientism. They used this same process for global warming - remember Al Gore in 2006 blockbuster “An Inconvenient Truth” where he breathlessly promised all the ocean ice would melt by 2014, by relying on “scientific consensus” and “scientific modeling”? (Globohomo wasn’t really very hard with his follow-up, a Downs-syndrome low IQ child).
But even most peer-reviewed science is fake, as you point out -- the "replication crisis". Due to lopsided funding incentives — most scientists rely on university and government funds for their studies and want to advance in their careers and achieve future funding, so they tell their sponsors the data they want to hear — most studies can’t be replicated. There’s also a revolving door between government and scientific institutions, so the motivation to advance political agendas instead of following actual science is enormous.
So I do think there is a real distinction between repeatable experiments as science vs. science by "scientific consensus" dictate or corrupted "studies", although in the real world, in the present era, it's almost entirely the latter.
Re: the game of blowing holes in official historical narratives, it's a fun thing to do, but to get people to take it seriously it's almost always downstream from a person becoming a dissident through areas that affect their own lives. In other words, people become dissidents first when they have girl trouble and become red-pilled to have better success getting laid (because the official narrative about women's thoughts and behaviors is not close to reality); or when they're fat because they eat a heavy carb diet like "doctors" tell them to, and then discover high protein low carb diets and lose weight, in the process becoming disillusioned with the medical establishment; or even political disillusionment, when people vote for "change" candidates and never seen any change. Then after they become dissidents then they become more open to alternative theories about history.
Here's my own additions...
Is the evidence compelling that the Soviets were poised to attack Nazi Germany only a few months after the start of Operation Barbarossa because the Soviet troops were massed offensively and they had maps of Germany in hand (Suvorov’s thesis in Icebreaker)? What about the theory by James Bacque in Other Losses that Eisenhower intentionally caused the starvation or exposure deaths of around a million German prisoners of war held in Western internment camps, covered up by the West? What about the question of whether esteemed scientist Albert Einstein was a plagiarist and a thief? Is dark matter even real, or is it nonsense gobbledygook to try to fix irreparably broken formulas? Is oil named “fossil fuels” without having anything to do with fossils, and simply to increase oil prices? Did polio vaccines really cure polio, or was the reduction in polio rates entirely due to the elimination of DDT use in America? How much of Roman antiquity actually happened - perhaps its far less than mainstream society believes? Perhaps even 700 years of history, 300-1000 AD, simply didn’t happen? Was Nixon guilty, or was Watergate a CIA plot and he was innocent? We know the U.S. plans false flag operations - see Operation Northwoods - what other false flags has it planned or participated in? Why did 7 World Trade Center collapse when it was never hit by a plane on 9/11 (the official story that debris hit the building and burned until it collapsed seems nonsensical on its face) and eyewitnesses heard and saw and heard controlled explosions in the building? Did Israel have advance knowledge of 9/11? Was the Oklahoma City bombing the result of a governmental conspiracy? What percent of white Americans actually owned slaves in 1860 pre-Civil War - was it actually only 1.4%? (The answer is yes despite Snopes obfuscation). And were Jews overrepresented in the slave trade? Did slaves have terrible lives and desperately want their freedom, or did many lead better lives than the free poor, who had no value and no protector? Are many black rappers really “thug rappers”, or did they put on a front to sell records and many were actually homosexual dilettantes (see Tupac’s early mannerisms for an example)? Do the elites manipulate the weather? Do current top elites have access to life extension therapies that the public doesn’t have access to? Don’t rely on anyone else, media spin, or establishment experts to make up your own mind for you - do your research and make up your own mind.
"Witch swimming was the practice of tying up and dunking the accused into a body of water to determine whether they sink or float. Sinking to the bottom indicated that the accused was innocent while floating indicated a guilty verdict."
The interweaving of science with theology enhances its preeminence thus giving it a mystical cultist power allowing charlatans to demand "trust" or "blind faith" from naive proles for theories supporting policies against the best interests of everyone except the ruling class. It's sort of like a "shell game" where you can either trust the science, or the plan.
"By “science” I mean the scientific theories that are in favor among the political elites."
Well, if you're free to define it that way, of course everything else you say follows. But that viewpoint shoves aside basic science, in the sense of scrupulous observation and meticulous reasoning. Such activities have improved man’s understanding of nature, and afforded us the means to develop technologies (not the same thing). That’s “science” too, and the more nuanced question is, how the one serving humanity becomes seduced into serving elites.
You often go into high dudgeon about systemic corruption of various sorts, which I feel usually betrays a lack of historical understanding. Not surprising: you've occasionally dismissed history itself because it isn't predictive, like Marx promised.
Agreed that history isn’t a ouija board of some sort that will tell the future. It's more like a tableau portraying how the forces of human nature play themselves out, which like art in general, lets us recognize similar episodes when they occur before us.
The historical reality that I feel your article ignores is, no matter how carefully constructed a system, someone is going to come along and game it. While it's prudent to try to prevent this, it's naive to expect it won't happen.
So, you'd EXPECT that science in the idealistic sense would be corrupted into science in the political sense. The general public's faith in it's idealistic practice, such as it is, is too tempting an apple to be left unused by our oligarchs in the service of their propaganda.
Another example of corruptive emergence is the oligarchic politics you report about the Ukraine military op. Again, we should be less surprised than curious over why the Dnieper bridges haven't been destroyed. Whose business is at stake?
History documents that since before 1900, business operations, whether oligarchic or corporate, have become comparable to or larger than national operations. This means we should expect business welfare to be taken into account as often as national welfare, regardless of how offensive that might be to patriotic sensibilities, such as those of Strelkov, honest Donbassians or even yourself.
But this form of national corruption shouldn't be surprising to anyone familiar with the support that the Rothschild banks gave Hitler, or the curious exemption of Ford factories from otherwise wholesale German bombing. It was a higher priority to destroy porcelain in Dresden than military machinery in the Ruhr.
This brings up my concerns over your advocacy of militarism and autocracy. It does sound liberating and empowering, In fact, Hitler also discussed the same advantages that you do in his Mein Kampf, and they sound good there, too. But uber-patriotism and national dominance are vulnerable to corrupting influences that turn appealing inspiration into self-destructive fanaticism. Actually, you'd expect savvy propagandists to inflame these emotions for their own purpose, and turn national volk, whether Slavic or Teutonic or Anglo or Jewish, into an unthinking juggernaut which, rather than acting in the group’s own self-interest, can instead be persuaded to implement its own self-destruction.
When you come down to it, having faith in any system is a sin of pride, a belief that any institution automatically will correct itself. The American Constitution was designed by as knowledgeable and careful statesman as you're likely to find anywhere, and every day, it more and more resembles the subject of Shelley's Ozymandias. Jefferson’s gave a prescription to prevent this in his comment about the tree of Liberty needing refreshment with the blood of patriots, which is better read as a call for continuous courage than a call for occasional violence.
From this angle, the issue of corruption is more spiritual than structural. Sadly, every institution will corrupt itself, and all we have to restrain this process are the lessons that appear dimly through the fog of history...alongside spiritual and physical courage (some of which you describe here) to keep our society’s sense of justice on an even keel.
And I believe the Esotericist is doing yeoman’s work translating those German biological theories you mentioned into English right here on Substack: https://esotericist.substack.com.
The Dinosaurs were wiped out by the Atlanteans with crystal powered death lasers who then used the weapons against themselves and sunk their continent.
Marijuana legalizers used to quote technical data points back in the 90s. The liner notes for Cypress Hill's "Black Sunday" album listed 19 historical tidbits about hemp (otherwise not well attested in the musical work, however). But what was Science Fiction then is today's Science Fact
This is why every 'political' movement is really just an expression of something I don't have a name for, but it's features are always the same: There is an 'exoteric' side that faces the common people ('peasants') and an 'esoteric' side that is for the few that can handle the cognitive dissonance of 'selling the truth' without actually caring about the truth. The Right's endless num-numing at the dead tit of 'truth' is why it can never win.
Rather than figuring out how to organize a mass movement, we just teach everyone on our side how to use the Neville Goddard Method of reality-selection and concentrate on the same reality to be created,
This gives me hope for a future regime that ditches all the materialism and tranny crap and brings back race science.
So, you don't Trust zee science...infidel!
I usually get a chuckle -or a mild despair, depending on my mood- when people claim to believe The Science.
The poor suckers don't even realize that "believing" The Science is an oxymoron.
Science is the name of a process to uncover the most truthful statement. The moment somebody starts believing "The Science" the science stops.
Believing takes the 'science' out of "The Science".
Btw: Real science, independent of the state, died a long time ago. No wonder that there are no more break trough discoveries. Only refinements.
"Further research needed = pay me again"
💬 Catholics burned Giordano Bruno for his astronomical theories.
↑↑ Your BS detector seems in urgent need of serious overhaul 😇 The Great Myths 3: Giordano Bruno was a Martyr for Science --> historyforatheists.com/2017/03/the-great-myths-3-giordano-bruno-was-a-martyr-for-science/
Innit patently illustrative/suggestive that you swallow this particular myth wholesale—while valiantly rejecting others similarly entrenched? Curious minds would be well-advised to investigate the reasons behind 😉
The Einstein relativity dogma is a classic example, it is has been disproved so many times & is in itself not based on any verifiable evidence, yet its accepted as fact. Einstein spent not one day in a lab in his life, or conducting experiments elsewhere. When it was discovered that galaxies have a uniform rotation rate - that should have destroyed Einstein's relativity - instead, they invented dark matter & dark energy. The evidence for this? None. None is needed. They jus invented it to maintain the Einstein myth.
>People get really mad when I deny that black holes exist or make the claim that the earth is hollow and expanding, or assert that virology is a pseudoscience and deny the existence of Charlemagne and the so-called ‘dark ages’,. Lol.
That is one reason I like to read your posts, I have pretty similar views.
As for Charlemagne, there is a German author Heribert Illig who wrote a book about "phantom time" .
Not sure I agree with all the conclusions, but it has some interesting tidbits.
"According to this scenario, the entire Carolingian period, including the figure of Charlemagne, is a fabrication, with a "phantom time" of 297 years (AD 614–911) added to the Early Middle Ages. "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phantom_time_hypothesis
Needless to say, the EUSSR Bolsheviks in Brussels hate it, they have a Charlemagne price, and it also puts into question the myth of Karlsruhe, "where Charlemagne rests" by name, which has a pyramid city layout that Washington DC copied.
As for black holes, or what they call them, I could show you one with any magnet and a field viewer.
A field viewer is two simple glass plates with ferro fluid in between them put together with duck tape and a bunch of LEDs to illuminate the "screen". You put a magnet under the viewer, and will see at the center of the Torriod a "black hole", you can also see blue and red shift. Fine Holography easily built yourself. A drop of blood would do instead of buying a ferro fluid.
As for these mentioned German documents and texts, I think it is about time soon, to make them accessible for non German speakers. However, I know a lot of people who utterly fear that, it truly scares them.
I love every time that I hear someone "believes" in Science. Well we did kind of get Huxley's Scientific Dictatorship after all. Global Warming/Climate Change is my favorite. Killing the earth to save it with "renewables." Science is a tool. I don't believe in my hammer any more than I believe in Science. If your science doesn't fit reality then it is wrong, figure out a different means; this was supposed to be the Scientific Method but that got jettisoned as soon as it was convenient. Modern Physics revolves around mathematics now, a complete inversion of the relationship.
Dark Matter and Energy are other fun absurdities, they're a fudge factor to make a model work. Humanity being the product of transgenic evolution despite evidence of human habitation going back millions of years. Electric Universe is a fun way to get people riled up.
This is a fun post and very entertaining, thank you.
One piece of feedback: you should differentiate the two definitions of science. While the media pushed “Trust the Science!” slogans throughout the “pandemic”, which pro-government supporters eagerly adopted and pushed on their unfortunate friends and family as a virtue signal, what these people really trusted was Scientism: science as politicized approval by committee, i.e. trust the “scientific consensus” which relied on incomplete and inaccurate data modeling combined with massive pressure to conform to group decisions. This was an intentional bastardization of the traditional understanding of the definition of science as "a series of rigorous, repeatable experiments under rigid criteria." If you can’t repeat an experiment, it isn’t science — it’s scientism. They used this same process for global warming - remember Al Gore in 2006 blockbuster “An Inconvenient Truth” where he breathlessly promised all the ocean ice would melt by 2014, by relying on “scientific consensus” and “scientific modeling”? (Globohomo wasn’t really very hard with his follow-up, a Downs-syndrome low IQ child).
But even most peer-reviewed science is fake, as you point out -- the "replication crisis". Due to lopsided funding incentives — most scientists rely on university and government funds for their studies and want to advance in their careers and achieve future funding, so they tell their sponsors the data they want to hear — most studies can’t be replicated. There’s also a revolving door between government and scientific institutions, so the motivation to advance political agendas instead of following actual science is enormous.
So I do think there is a real distinction between repeatable experiments as science vs. science by "scientific consensus" dictate or corrupted "studies", although in the real world, in the present era, it's almost entirely the latter.
Re: the game of blowing holes in official historical narratives, it's a fun thing to do, but to get people to take it seriously it's almost always downstream from a person becoming a dissident through areas that affect their own lives. In other words, people become dissidents first when they have girl trouble and become red-pilled to have better success getting laid (because the official narrative about women's thoughts and behaviors is not close to reality); or when they're fat because they eat a heavy carb diet like "doctors" tell them to, and then discover high protein low carb diets and lose weight, in the process becoming disillusioned with the medical establishment; or even political disillusionment, when people vote for "change" candidates and never seen any change. Then after they become dissidents then they become more open to alternative theories about history.
Here's my own additions...
Is the evidence compelling that the Soviets were poised to attack Nazi Germany only a few months after the start of Operation Barbarossa because the Soviet troops were massed offensively and they had maps of Germany in hand (Suvorov’s thesis in Icebreaker)? What about the theory by James Bacque in Other Losses that Eisenhower intentionally caused the starvation or exposure deaths of around a million German prisoners of war held in Western internment camps, covered up by the West? What about the question of whether esteemed scientist Albert Einstein was a plagiarist and a thief? Is dark matter even real, or is it nonsense gobbledygook to try to fix irreparably broken formulas? Is oil named “fossil fuels” without having anything to do with fossils, and simply to increase oil prices? Did polio vaccines really cure polio, or was the reduction in polio rates entirely due to the elimination of DDT use in America? How much of Roman antiquity actually happened - perhaps its far less than mainstream society believes? Perhaps even 700 years of history, 300-1000 AD, simply didn’t happen? Was Nixon guilty, or was Watergate a CIA plot and he was innocent? We know the U.S. plans false flag operations - see Operation Northwoods - what other false flags has it planned or participated in? Why did 7 World Trade Center collapse when it was never hit by a plane on 9/11 (the official story that debris hit the building and burned until it collapsed seems nonsensical on its face) and eyewitnesses heard and saw and heard controlled explosions in the building? Did Israel have advance knowledge of 9/11? Was the Oklahoma City bombing the result of a governmental conspiracy? What percent of white Americans actually owned slaves in 1860 pre-Civil War - was it actually only 1.4%? (The answer is yes despite Snopes obfuscation). And were Jews overrepresented in the slave trade? Did slaves have terrible lives and desperately want their freedom, or did many lead better lives than the free poor, who had no value and no protector? Are many black rappers really “thug rappers”, or did they put on a front to sell records and many were actually homosexual dilettantes (see Tupac’s early mannerisms for an example)? Do the elites manipulate the weather? Do current top elites have access to life extension therapies that the public doesn’t have access to? Don’t rely on anyone else, media spin, or establishment experts to make up your own mind for you - do your research and make up your own mind.
This was so good I didn’t want the article to end. Perfect!! And thank you for sharing it on your Substack.
"Witch swimming was the practice of tying up and dunking the accused into a body of water to determine whether they sink or float. Sinking to the bottom indicated that the accused was innocent while floating indicated a guilty verdict."
The interweaving of science with theology enhances its preeminence thus giving it a mystical cultist power allowing charlatans to demand "trust" or "blind faith" from naive proles for theories supporting policies against the best interests of everyone except the ruling class. It's sort of like a "shell game" where you can either trust the science, or the plan.
"By “science” I mean the scientific theories that are in favor among the political elites."
Well, if you're free to define it that way, of course everything else you say follows. But that viewpoint shoves aside basic science, in the sense of scrupulous observation and meticulous reasoning. Such activities have improved man’s understanding of nature, and afforded us the means to develop technologies (not the same thing). That’s “science” too, and the more nuanced question is, how the one serving humanity becomes seduced into serving elites.
You often go into high dudgeon about systemic corruption of various sorts, which I feel usually betrays a lack of historical understanding. Not surprising: you've occasionally dismissed history itself because it isn't predictive, like Marx promised.
Agreed that history isn’t a ouija board of some sort that will tell the future. It's more like a tableau portraying how the forces of human nature play themselves out, which like art in general, lets us recognize similar episodes when they occur before us.
The historical reality that I feel your article ignores is, no matter how carefully constructed a system, someone is going to come along and game it. While it's prudent to try to prevent this, it's naive to expect it won't happen.
So, you'd EXPECT that science in the idealistic sense would be corrupted into science in the political sense. The general public's faith in it's idealistic practice, such as it is, is too tempting an apple to be left unused by our oligarchs in the service of their propaganda.
Another example of corruptive emergence is the oligarchic politics you report about the Ukraine military op. Again, we should be less surprised than curious over why the Dnieper bridges haven't been destroyed. Whose business is at stake?
History documents that since before 1900, business operations, whether oligarchic or corporate, have become comparable to or larger than national operations. This means we should expect business welfare to be taken into account as often as national welfare, regardless of how offensive that might be to patriotic sensibilities, such as those of Strelkov, honest Donbassians or even yourself.
But this form of national corruption shouldn't be surprising to anyone familiar with the support that the Rothschild banks gave Hitler, or the curious exemption of Ford factories from otherwise wholesale German bombing. It was a higher priority to destroy porcelain in Dresden than military machinery in the Ruhr.
This brings up my concerns over your advocacy of militarism and autocracy. It does sound liberating and empowering, In fact, Hitler also discussed the same advantages that you do in his Mein Kampf, and they sound good there, too. But uber-patriotism and national dominance are vulnerable to corrupting influences that turn appealing inspiration into self-destructive fanaticism. Actually, you'd expect savvy propagandists to inflame these emotions for their own purpose, and turn national volk, whether Slavic or Teutonic or Anglo or Jewish, into an unthinking juggernaut which, rather than acting in the group’s own self-interest, can instead be persuaded to implement its own self-destruction.
When you come down to it, having faith in any system is a sin of pride, a belief that any institution automatically will correct itself. The American Constitution was designed by as knowledgeable and careful statesman as you're likely to find anywhere, and every day, it more and more resembles the subject of Shelley's Ozymandias. Jefferson’s gave a prescription to prevent this in his comment about the tree of Liberty needing refreshment with the blood of patriots, which is better read as a call for continuous courage than a call for occasional violence.
From this angle, the issue of corruption is more spiritual than structural. Sadly, every institution will corrupt itself, and all we have to restrain this process are the lessons that appear dimly through the fog of history...alongside spiritual and physical courage (some of which you describe here) to keep our society’s sense of justice on an even keel.
Fantastic article!
And I believe the Esotericist is doing yeoman’s work translating those German biological theories you mentioned into English right here on Substack: https://esotericist.substack.com.
Dinos not real... so there weren't any giant lizards hundreds of millions of years ago?
The Dinosaurs were wiped out by the Atlanteans with crystal powered death lasers who then used the weapons against themselves and sunk their continent.
Also, talking of crystals just listened to this: James Tunney on Crystals, Dark and Light on Podbean, check it out !https://www.podbean.com/wlei/pb-gyts5-13a9420
Highly recommend James Tunney podcasts, he talks about the political use of science technology.
Marijuana legalizers used to quote technical data points back in the 90s. The liner notes for Cypress Hill's "Black Sunday" album listed 19 historical tidbits about hemp (otherwise not well attested in the musical work, however). But what was Science Fiction then is today's Science Fact
This is why every 'political' movement is really just an expression of something I don't have a name for, but it's features are always the same: There is an 'exoteric' side that faces the common people ('peasants') and an 'esoteric' side that is for the few that can handle the cognitive dissonance of 'selling the truth' without actually caring about the truth. The Right's endless num-numing at the dead tit of 'truth' is why it can never win.
Rather than figuring out how to organize a mass movement, we just teach everyone on our side how to use the Neville Goddard Method of reality-selection and concentrate on the same reality to be created,
That way, we all arrive at the same reality.
Just a thought.