Isn’t that what we’re all wondering?
Let’s start by pointing out that the conditions for overthrow are simply not there yet. No, I’m not saying that inflation has to reach a certain point or that some sort of Hegelian criss-cross of lines hasn’t been spotted yet in the Politburo’s tea leaves. Nor am I saying that there needs to be starving peasants in the streets. Actually, I’m saying the opposite. The situation has to get better - better for us that is.
The basic thrust of my argument for today is that there have to be organized groups in society that push for one change or another for a true shake-up in the status quo to occur. It’s a simple enough point, in my mind, but for some reason Westerners have a hard time understanding that groups, whether ideological, ethnic or otherwise, exist and individual members in these groups promote a group agenda.
We’re NOT all, like, individuals, man.
In the traditional arrangement that we used to see in societies, (one that I would argue hasn’t changed much and remains visible for those with eyes to see) we see that certain castes find themselves at odds with other castes or already subjugated to them in the reigning political order. You know what I’m talking about: priests, soldiers, merchants, peasants, yeoman and so on. These are the archetypical castes identifiable in almost every single society that has ever existed (except ours, of course).
Change comes when one caste decides to shake things up a bit and make a bid for greater power.
The classic example that I like to bring up when explaining what I’m theorizing about here is the Iranian revolution. There, the clergy rose up against the ruling class and made an alliance with the military. This caste alliance + the support of the mindless NPC rabble swung the scales in the favor of the revolutionaries against the ruling class and voila - rule by Mullah and the Revolutionary Guard.
So, which caste will be the driving force of the revolution in the West, you ask?
Well, there are no such already-ready revolutionary castes, of course. The military class, i.e., the officers are pampered poodles waiting to join the private sector and stick their snouts into the never-ending trough of tax-payer money. And the rank-and-file are retarded crayon-eating lolbertarians at best. There is no such idea in their heads, even, that they could take power, as a caste or an organization. In other countries, where this has taken place more than once in their nation’s history, they know that this is a possibility. But literally no one in the military in the US can even conceive of such an action because it hasn’t been done before. Furthermore, it would be “wrong” because it contradicts the moral presuppositions of the merchant republic that they serve. In other words, other castes have internalized the values of the ruling oligarchic caste as their own, despite not belonging to the same caste and not even holding the same values, really.
As for the priest caste, both Bible-thumpers and secular professors are largely in agreement with messianic globalist Liberalism. Capitalism and Christianity are synonyms in America. Frankly, I agree with the Protestants and believe that their money-grubbing, Israel-worshipping version of Christianity is indeed the correct one. But that is a topic for another post related to Marcion, scheduled for later this week.
Speaking of which, I often do write about how the teachings and tenants of a regional, ethnic god by the name of Yahweh was equated with the teachings of a universal cosmic deity in a rather shocking theological bait and switch psyop by the swindlers who created Nicene Christianity that we are still struggling with today. This is really no different. The values of the ruling caste are portrayed as universal values when they’re actually relative values and self-serving ones at that. When the you-know-whos got together and wrote a book declaring themselves God’s Chosen (people actually believed them, wow) and constructed an entire system of morality and ethics that was then imposed on other peoples, so too did the values of the merchant class take on a universal veneer that we now know as Liberalism. Few have the intelligence or courage to point out that these rules, values and ethics are contrived and can ultimately be rejected, overthrown and replaced with the worldview of another caste ... or another god.
But, OK, ok.
I can sense that I’m losing people and that I need to stay on track to drive home some key points and secure the updoots that my ego craves.
So, basically, changes in power are really just changes in caste hierarchy. One caste or one caste coalition takes power relative to the others. These revolutions can be bloody or relatively bloodless, but the consequences are still very tangible and real.
As I stated before, you need organized segments of society working against the current status quo to affect a change in power. You might disagree vehemently, but I’ll settle for understanding before I start demanding acceptance of the theory.
Pat Buchanan and his MARs (Middle American Radicals) movement tried to rally the yeoman middle-class of America. Trump went further and appealed to the same people, plus members of the former middle class i.e., the powerless, unorganized masses.
The rebellion was short-lived though. All bark and no bite. But, still, the concept holds.
Should a more useful and skilled segment of society start to mutiny, well, we’d be in business. As things stand now, no such organized exists that I am aware of. But there are always sub-sectors of sectors that could be promising.
Unvaccinated soldiers, for example. Or ham radio users. Racist gamers. Substack bloggers (lol). And Ultimate Frisbee enthusiasts? Maybe?
On a more serious note, Silicon Valley seems to be looking to make big moves to carve out a piece of political pie for themselves at the expense of the two traditional pillars of power in America - Wall St. and Washington. Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Peter Thiel and even Mark Zuckerberg have expressed their frustration with how the economy is being run. These oligarchs have competent people working under them and a well-funded and organized structure that can organize and rally people. Chance are, they’ll start making more and more moves politically.
I’m not saying that this is a good thing, but it is a working proof for the theory.
In the case of the West, I don’t see anything or anyone who is organized and capable of putting up an organized resistance to the powers that be, sadly.
But in the case of Russia, I’m pinning all my hopes on the military.
Your article explains why Trudeau evoked the Emergency Act to collapse the Freedom Convoy which united Canadians to protest government vacinnes edicts, etc. Thanks for your analysis.
Liberalism is very parallel to me with aristocrats and their historic behavior. I don't think the connection is only superficial. Make people comfortable and they see themselves as above the laws of nature. Life truly is suffering, a life worth living anyway.
As far as who will overthrow globohomo, you're right there is no one. It goes along with the" blackpill" theory that nothing can be saved, which I'm convinced of myself just by the nature of the universe always functioning in cycles. Balkanization of the west seems guaranteed, then we can see what new classes emerge in those new lands. The notion of MAGA is silly at this point, half the population didn't want to be great again. You can't salvage something if the only solution is a 180 of the whole of society and people changing overnight. What are Americans going to do, start going door to door killing immigrants and liberals? Retarded neo-nazis seem to think so but I have my doubts to put it lightly.